Christel Annemieke Romein2026-03-052026-03-052021978-3-319-69623-958https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74240-9https://link.springer.com/openurl?genre=book&isbn=978-3-030-74240-9http://bibliovirtual.umar.mx:4000/handle/123456789/1909Libro electrónicoThis open access book presents a comparative analysis of the use of fatherland terminology in a political and legal context in Jülich, Hesse-Cassel and Brittany from 1642 to 1655. Fatherland terminology includes words such as patria, patriot and nation. In historiography, the use of these words by the nobility is often interpreted as an early sign of nationalism that conflicted with the prince’s initiation of state-building. The book argues that neither ‘states’ nor ‘nationalism’ truly existed yet; rather, the political arena was dominated by dynasties. Further, it rejects the notion of deliberate state-building and demonstrates that the nobility used this terminology to object to princely politics as part of adopting a “presupposed office.” This status allowed the nobility to place itself outside the ruler-subject constellation and critique the situation.en-USBook